Marketing Is the New Bottleneck
The one thing you need to know in AI today | AI-Ready CMO
This is about to become awkward for every company that adopts AI seriously: the marketing team will be the slowest team in the building.
Andrew Ng (founder of Google Brain and AI legend) wrote about this last week, almost in passing. When AI-native engineering teams ship 10x or 100x faster, every adjacent function suddenly looks slow. He calls out marketing specifically — features built in a day, then weeks of scrambling to figure out how to communicate them. He even has a name for it:
The Marketing Bottleneck. That’s a bit of a pinch in the gut.
For most of the last twenty years, engineering took six months, marketing took six weeks, and nobody worried about who was slower because the math worked. The math doesn’t work anymore. If your eng team is shipping features faster than your CMS can publish a landing page for them, no amount of “we need a better campaign brief template” is going to fix it.
In Partnership with Am I on AI
Is your GEO budget allocated in the right places?
Most marketing leaders we talk to have started investing in GEO. Almost none of them know if it’s working.
Not because they’re not paying attention. Because they don’t have the right intelligence yet.
If you can’t answer “which of my channels is actually driving AI visibility?” - you’re running blind.
Run a free audit and find out where you actually stand.
Marketing isn’t slow because marketers are slow. We built it that way.
Brief goes to strategy. Strategy goes to creative. Creative goes to review. Review goes to the channel. Channel goes to analytics. Half a dozen people, a stack of meetings, and a Slack thread everyone tries to actively avoid. Each handoff was a fair tax when the rest of the company ran on the same clock. Now it’s the whole bill.
Cat Wu, who runs Claude Code at Anthropic, said something on Lenny’s podcast this week that I keep coming back to: “jobs are fake.” Her point is that if you understand the constraints and the goal, you can usually figure out what needs to happen and just do it — without waiting for someone with the right title to bless it. At Anthropic, PMs ship code, engineers write product specs, and designers do front-end. The roles blur because the work doesn’t care about the roles. The org chart is the bottleneck.
So what does an AI-native marketing team look like?
Smaller. Flatter. Heavy on generalists who can carry an idea from “I noticed this thing on Twitter” to a live landing page by Friday, without involving four other teams. The job titles still exist on LinkedIn. Inside the team, nobody really cares which one is yours.
If you’re a senior marketing leader, this is uncomfortable. A lot of what you’ve been promoted to do is run handoffs. You manage the strategy → creative → channel chain. You are the chain. Most of us are going to resist this for as long as we can, because the alternative is admitting that the team we built was sized for a tempo that no longer exists.
So what do you actually do about it this week?
First, pick one deliverable — a launch post, a brief, a landing page — and run it through one person end-to-end. No relay. Either quality drops, or you’ve been paying handoff tax for nothing.
Second, look at your recurring meetings and ask which ones exist only to coordinate handoffs. If you cancel the relay, the meeting goes with it.
Third, the next time you’re hiring or writing a promotion case, weight “can carry an idea to a live thing alone” higher than depth in a single specialty. Even if it makes the job description harder to write.
Yes, the teams that figure it out will be a lot smaller than the ones we run today. Some of us are going to be on the wrong side of that math. Pretending otherwise just delays the conversation.
— Torsten and Peter
Share with a colleague. Earn paid membership months.
Your AI Marketing Tools